Medical bail requires demonstrated necessity; clinical stability and assured treatment led to dismissal of interim bail request.

Medical circumstances did not warrant interim bail because the medical board found the petitioner clinically stable, while advising continued management and angiography for further evaluation. The pending regular bail petition was already listed before the High Court, and an undertaking ensured appropriate treatment, including angiography if required. The Supreme Court dismissed the special leave petition seeking bail on medical grounds without expressing any view on the merits of the regular bail petition.

---

---

Issues: Whether medical circumstances warranted grant of bail pending consideration of the regular bail petition by the High Court.

Analysis: The medical board reported that the petitioner was clinically stable, while advising continued medical management and angiography for further evaluation. The regular bail petition was already listed before the High Court, and an undertaking was recorded that appropriate treatment, including angiography if required, would be ensured.

Outcome: The special leave petition seeking bail on medical grounds was dismissed, without any opinion on the merits of the pending bail petition.

---