Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the assessment order was entertainable despite the statutory appellate remedy, where objections to the draft assessment order were not filed before the Dispute Resolution Panel.
Analysis: Section 144C(2)(b) requires objections to a draft assessment order to be filed before both the Dispute Resolution Panel and the Assessing Officer. As no objections were filed before the Panel, Section 144C(3) permitted completion of the assessment on the basis of the draft order. The statutory scheme also provided an appeal under Section 246A. In view of the efficacious alternative remedy under the taxing statute, exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 was not warranted.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertainable; the petitioner must pursue the statutory appellate remedy, with all merits left open.