Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether extraordinary writ jurisdiction could be invoked to challenge a GST assessment order where the statutory appeal had become time-barred and a rectification application was pending.
Analysis: The statutory appellate remedy was available but had become barred by limitation. The pending rectification application also appeared to be time-barred. Expiry of the period for pursuing the statutory appeal does not, by itself, justify exercise of extraordinary jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
Conclusion: The writ petition challenging the assessment order was not maintainable in extraordinary jurisdiction merely because the statutory appeal was time-barred; the issue was decided against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Lapse of the limitation period for a statutory appeal is not a ground for invoking extraordinary writ jurisdiction to obtain relief against a fiscal assessment order.