Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether delayed payment charges recovered by a stockbroker from clients for delayed settlement obligations or margin trading facility are taxable as consideration for agreeing to tolerate an act under Section 66E(e).
Analysis: Delayed payment charges arise only upon default in timely payment, after the stockbroker has discharged settlement obligations to the exchange. They are penal and compensatory charges for overdue amounts, not charges for stockbroking services or a separately agreed activity of tolerating delayed payment. The contractual penal clauses safeguard commercial interests and do not establish that the parties intended delay as the object of the arrangement. Departmental circulars under the service-tax and GST regimes also recognise that delayed payment charges are not consideration for taxable services.
Conclusion: Delayed payment charges are not taxable as a declared service under Section 66E(e); the issue is decided in favour of the assessee.