Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the reassessment order was vitiated for non-issuance of notice under section 143(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 when the return filed in response to notice under section 148 was relied upon by the Assessing Officer.
Analysis: The return filed in response to section 148 was treated by the law as a return under section 139. The assessee's explanation that the return could not be e-verified initially, and was later e-verified before the assessment order, was not rebutted. The record also did not show issuance of notice under section 143(2), and the Revenue did not dislodge that factual position. Since the Assessing Officer used the return filed under section 148, issuance of notice under section 143(2) was mandatory before framing the reassessment. Non-issuance of that notice rendered the reassessment unsustainable in law.
Conclusion: The reassessment order was held to be bad in law and ab initio void for want of notice under section 143(2), and the assessee succeeded.