Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the amount received under a redevelopment agreement for grant of development rights was chargeable under the head "Capital Gains" or under the head "Income from Other Sources", and whether exemption under section 54EC was consequentially available.
Analysis: The agreement recorded grant of development rights to the developer for consideration, while the owners retained only certain rights in the redeveloped property. Development rights are valuable rights forming part of the bundle of rights in immovable property and constitute a capital asset. The receipt was contractual consideration directly linked to the rights parted with by the assessee and could not be treated as a casual or independent payment. The residuary head under section 56 could not be invoked where the receipt was referable to the specific head "Capital Gains". The accounting treatment adopted by the payer did not control the tax character of the receipt in the hands of the recipient.
Conclusion: The receipt of Rs. 50,00,000/- was held to be consideration for grant or transfer of development rights and was chargeable under the head "Capital Gains", not "Income from Other Sources". The assessee's claim for exemption under section 54EC was directed to be allowed in accordance with law.