Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the adjudication order passed under Section 73 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was liable to be quashed for want of a proper opportunity of personal hearing before passing the adverse order.
Analysis: The order records that the petitioner was called upon to file replies to the show cause notice on multiple dates, but no separate or effective opportunity of personal hearing was granted before the adverse adjudication. Reliance was placed on the statutory requirement under Section 75(4) that hearing shall be granted where an adverse decision is contemplated, and the Court treated the requirement of personal hearing as a mandatory facet of fair adjudication under taxing statutes. In the absence of a valid hearing, the adjudicating authority could not sustain the order on merits.
Conclusion: The impugned order was unsustainable and was quashed. The matter was remanded to the assessing authority to pass a fresh order after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.