TaxTMI Login
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Just a moment...
AI Drafter - (New and Powerful) ✕ Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition challenging the show cause notice and adjudication order was maintainable in view of the statutory alternative remedy of appeal under the CGST Act.
Analysis: The petitioner's challenge was opposed on the ground that an appeal lay under Section 107(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court found that the petitioner had an efficacious statutory remedy before the appellate authority and, on that basis, declined to entertain the writ petition.
Conclusion: The writ petition was not entertained because the petitioner was relegated to the statutory appellate remedy.
TaxTMI 
