Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petitions challenging the assessment orders under the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 were maintainable in view of the alternative statutory remedy of appeal, and whether any exception based on violation of natural justice was made out.
Analysis: The availability of an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 107 ordinarily bars writ interference in fiscal matters. Interference is justified only in exceptional cases such as breach of fundamental rights, violation of natural justice, excess of jurisdiction, or challenge to vires. On the facts, the show cause notice was found to be detailed, the petitioner had been issued repeated summons and granted opportunities, including adjournments, and no substantive denial of hearing was established. The Court therefore held that no case of violation of natural justice or other exceptional circumstance was made out to bypass the statutory appellate remedy.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were not maintainable and the petitioner was required to pursue the statutory appeal remedy.
Final Conclusion: The challenge to the assessment orders was rejected at the threshold, leaving the petitioner to avail the alternative appellate remedy under the Act.
Ratio Decidendi: In a fiscal dispute, a writ petition will not be entertained against an assessment order where an efficacious statutory appeal is available, unless a recognized exceptional ground for bypassing the alternate remedy is clearly established.