<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1352 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792150</link>
    <description>A writ petition challenging a show cause notice and adjudication order under GST was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST Act. The High Court held that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy under Section 107(1) instead of invoking writ jurisdiction, and therefore declined to entertain the petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 May 2026 08:27:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=903408" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1352 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792150</link>
      <description>A writ petition challenging a show cause notice and adjudication order under GST was found not maintainable because an efficacious statutory appeal was available under the CGST Act. The High Court held that the petitioner should pursue the appellate remedy under Section 107(1) instead of invoking writ jurisdiction, and therefore declined to entertain the petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=792150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>