Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's claim for monetary reward under the CBDT reward guidelines, which had remained pending, was liable to be considered and decided by the competent authority by a reasoned and speaking order.
Analysis: The petition proceeded on the basis that a recommendation in favour of the petitioner had already been made and that the claim had not been finally decided despite the passage of time. In view of the respondent's stand that the representation was still pending, the Court found it appropriate to direct consideration of the claim on the basis of the existing recommendation and the writ petition record. The matter was therefore disposed of with a direction to submit the relevant recommendation and order before the competent authority, which was then required to examine the claim in accordance with law and pass a reasoned and speaking order within the stipulated time.
Conclusion: The petitioner's pending reward claim was directed to be considered and decided by the competent authority in accordance with law by a reasoned and speaking order.