Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner's claim for monetary reward under the CBDT guidelines required consideration and disposal by the competent authority by a reasoned and speaking order.
Analysis: The petitioner's claim had remained pending for a long period despite a prior recommendation in his favour. The Court noted the respondents' submission that the representation was still pending before the competent authority. In these circumstances, the appropriate course was to direct the petitioner to place the recommendation and relevant papers before respondent No. 2 and require a decision on the claim in accordance with law within a fixed time. The relief granted was confined to consideration and decision of the pending claim, without adjudicating entitlement to the monetary reward itself.
Conclusion: The claim was directed to be considered and decided by the competent authority by a reasoned and speaking order within the stipulated time, in favour of the petitioner to that limited extent.