Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the approval granted under section 153D for the search assessment was valid, and whether absence of approval to the draft assessment order vitiated the assessment.
Analysis: Section 153D requires prior approval by the specified superior authority before completion of the assessment. The approval must show that the authority had before it the draft assessment order and the relevant material, and that the approval was granted after application of mind. A bare or omnibus approval, without reference to the draft order or the proposed additions, is mechanical and does not satisfy the statutory safeguard. On the facts, the approval letter did not show that the draft assessment order was examined, and the approval process did not conform to the mandated procedure.
Conclusion: The approval under section 153D was invalid and the assessment framed on that basis was quashed.
Ratio Decidendi: Prior approval under section 153D is a substantive safeguard requiring conscious consideration of the draft assessment order and relevant material; a mechanical or rubber-stamp approval vitiates the assessment.