<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 399 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791197</link>
    <description>Prior approval under section 153D is a substantive safeguard for search assessments and must be granted only after the superior authority applies its mind to the draft assessment order and relevant material. A bare or omnibus approval, without showing examination of the proposed additions or the draft order, is mechanical and does not satisfy the statutory requirement. On the facts, the approval letter did not indicate such consideration, so the approval was invalid and the assessment framed on that basis was quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:08:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=900368" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 399 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791197</link>
      <description>Prior approval under section 153D is a substantive safeguard for search assessments and must be granted only after the superior authority applies its mind to the draft assessment order and relevant material. A bare or omnibus approval, without showing examination of the proposed additions or the draft order, is mechanical and does not satisfy the statutory requirement. On the facts, the approval letter did not indicate such consideration, so the approval was invalid and the assessment framed on that basis was quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=791197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>