CESTAT upholds tax demand, remands case for cum-tax benefit & penalty waiver under Finance Act The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the tax demand but remanded the case for reconsideration of the appellant's claim for cum-tax benefit and ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
CESTAT upholds tax demand, remands case for cum-tax benefit & penalty waiver under Finance Act
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the tax demand but remanded the case for reconsideration of the appellant's claim for cum-tax benefit and waiver of penalty under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was partly allowed through remand.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT NEW DELHI upheld the tax demand but remanded the case to the lower appellate authority for reconsideration of the appellant's claim for cum-tax benefit and waiver of penalty under section 80 of the Finance Act, 1994. The appeal was partly allowed by way of remand.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.