Cash deposits and undisclosed commission in agricultural receipts: 69A addition set aside; commission addition upheld on evidence.

Addition under unexplained cash principles was disallowed where cash deposits in savings accounts traced to the assessee's cash book and to sale proceeds of agricultural produce, and agricultural receipts were accepted in a subsequent assessment year; consequence: addition under the unexplained cash provision set aside. Separately, an addition for alleged undisclosed commission based on Form 26AS was upheld because the profit and loss account showed no commission receipts and the assessee failed to produce creditable evidence that such commission was included in gross turnover; consequence: commission addition confirmed.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether addition of Rs. 1,55,73,900/- made under section 69A as unexplained cash deposits is sustainable; (ii) Whether addition of Rs. 10,445/- computed as 8% of contract receipts of Rs. 1,30,551/- is sustainable.

Issue (i): Whether the cash deposits of Rs. 1,55,73,900/- in saving bank accounts are unexplained money liable to be treated as deemed income under section 69A.

Analysis: The Tribunal examined the books of account, cash book entries and bank statements which showed contra entries for the alleged cash deposits and considered the certificate of the chartered accountant that the amounts were sale proceeds of agricultural produce. The Tribunal noted that agricultural turnover and related accounting had been accepted by the revenue in a subsequent assessment year and that the assessee maintained regular books recording the transactions. On test-checking, the Tribunal found that the source of the cash deposits corresponded with recorded sale proceeds reflected in the cash book and bank statements.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 1,55,73,900/- under section 69A is not sustainable and is set aside in favour of the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the estimated addition of Rs. 10,445/- on account of undisclosed commission income computed at 8% of Rs. 1,30,551/- is erroneous.

Analysis: The Tribunal reviewed the profit and loss account and the assessee's submissions. No credible evidence was found on record to demonstrate that the sum of Rs. 1,30,551/- represented commission income included within declared agricultural turnover or otherwise accounted for in the books. The addition was based on information appearing in statutory forms and the estimating exercise applied by the assessing officer and sustained by the appellate authority.

Conclusion: The addition of Rs. 10,445/- is sustainable and is confirmed against the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The appeal is partly allowed as the addition under section 69A is deleted while the addition of Rs. 10,445/- is confirmed; overall the Tribunal's decision favours the assessee on the major challenge and favours the revenue on the estimated commission addition.

Ratio Decidendi: Where alleged unexplained cash deposits are supported by contemporaneous books of account, bank statements and reliable corroborative certification identifying the amounts as sale proceeds accepted by revenue, such amounts cannot be treated as unexplained money under section 69A; however, estimated additions based on statutory information require credible evidence of assimilation into declared turnover to be displaced.

---