Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
- βοΈ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- π Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws β


Just a moment...
Introducing the βIn Favour Ofβ filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws β


Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Division Bench precedent and stare decisis in writ appeals; impugned orders left undisturbed, special leave petitions dismissed</h1> Stare decisis and Division Bench precedent were applied to decline interference in pending writ appeals where identical contentions were previously ... Writ appeals - Division Bench precedent - Stare decisis - Identical contentions negatived - HELD THAT:- We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order(s) [2025 (9) TMI 1738 - KERALA HIGH COURT] in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. Special Leave Petitions are, accordingly, dismissed. Outcome: Special Leave Petitions dismissed [No detailed order].