Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether Cenvat credit was admissible on duty-paid packing material used for packing spare parts of tractors; (ii) Whether the penalty under the excise law could be reduced below the statutory equal penalty.
Issue (i): Cenvat credit depends on whether duty had been paid on the packing material forming part of the goods supplied. Where the packing material was included in the cleared goods and duty had been paid thereon, the assessee was entitled to credit.
Conclusion: The first issue was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.
Issue (ii): The penalty question turned on the Tribunal's exercise of discretion in reducing the penalty. The High Court found no error in that reduction.
Conclusion: The second issue was answered against the Revenue.
Final Conclusion: The appeal failed and the Tribunal's order was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Cenvat credit is available on packing material on which duty has been paid, and the penalty determination will not be interfered with where the reduction is found to be justified.