Late Form 56F filing for s.10AA tax deduction claim-CBDT deadline extension upheld, disallowance overturned, deduction allowed

Deduction under s.10AA was denied by the CPC on the ground that Form 56F was filed belatedly. The ITAT held that, by virtue of a CBDT circular extending the due date for filing Form 56F to 31.12.2023, the assessee's filing on 19.12.2023 was within time; this extension was undisputed by the Revenue and was also acknowledged by the CPC. On this legal and factual basis, the ITAT found the disallowance arbitrary and contrary to the record, and directed allowance of the s.10AA deduction in favour of the assessee.

---

---

1. ISSUES PRESENTED AND CONSIDERED

(i) Whether the denial of deduction under section 10AA at the stage of processing under section 143(1) was sustainable when the record showed that Form 56F had been filed within the extended due date acknowledged by the tax administration.

(ii) Whether the appellate confirmation of the adjustment was vitiated for proceeding on an incorrect assumption about the due date for filing the return/form, resulting in an unsustainable disallowance of the section 10AA claim.

2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

Issue (i): Sustainability of disallowance of section 10AA deduction on the ground that Form 56F was not filed

Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Tribunal examined the adjustment made in processing under section 143(1), and the reason recorded by CPC for denying section 10AA deduction, namely non-filing of Form 56/56F. The Tribunal also considered the fact of extension of time for filing Form 56F as acknowledged in the processing record.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal found that the processing authority itself acknowledged that the due date for filing Form 56F for the relevant year stood extended up to 31.12.2023. On the basis of the material placed on record, including the e-filing acknowledgement, the Tribunal held it was a matter of record that Form 56F had in fact been filed on 19.12.2023 along with the return of income. Since the filing was within the extended time, the stated reason for denial-"Form 56 not filed"-was contrary to the record. The Tribunal therefore treated the adjustment as arbitrary and unsustainable because it ignored the admitted extension and the documented filing.

Conclusion: The disallowance of the section 10AA claim on the ground of non-filing of Form 56F was held to be contrary to facts and record; the adjustment was set aside and the deduction under section 10AA was allowed.

Issue (ii): Validity of appellate confirmation based on an incorrect presumption of the due date

Legal framework (as discussed by the Tribunal): The Tribunal evaluated the appellate reasoning sustaining the adjustment, particularly the reliance placed on the assumption that the relevant due date was 31.10.2023, and the resulting conclusion that filing on 19.12.2023 disentitled the deduction.

Interpretation and reasoning: The Tribunal held that the appellate authority's reasoning proceeded on a wrong presumption about the due date, because the due date for filing Form 56F had been extended up to 31.12.2023 and this extension was not disputed and was even acknowledged by CPC. Since Form 56F was filed on 19.12.2023, the foundational premise for sustaining the disallowance failed. The Tribunal therefore concluded that both the appellate order and the processing adjustment could not stand. The Tribunal additionally noted, for completeness, that the amendment referred to regarding section 10AA was stated to be applicable from 01.04.2024 and hence not applicable to the year under consideration; however, it clarified that the amendment issue was not involved for deciding the appeal.

Conclusion: The appellate confirmation was held unsustainable because it was based on an incorrect assumption about the due date, leading to an erroneous denial of deduction; the disallowance was set aside and the deduction under section 10AA was allowed.

---