Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessment order passed under section 73 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, deserved to be quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration, subject to further pre-deposit and filing of reply.
Analysis: The petitioner had already deposited 10% of the disputed tax at the time of filing the belated appeal. The order was passed after the petitioner failed to respond to the show cause notice and the materials placed before the Court disclosed personal difficulties for the delay. In the circumstances, and following the approach adopted in similar cases, the existing order was treated as requiring reconsideration on merits, while protecting the revenue by imposing an additional pre-deposit and directing the petitioner to file a reply with supporting documents.
Conclusion: The impugned order was quashed and the matter was remitted to the authority for fresh adjudication, subject to compliance with the stipulated pre-deposit and reply requirements.
Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained conditional relief by securing quashing of the assessment order and remand for fresh decision, with liberty reserved to the department to proceed in case of non-compliance.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxpayer has made a partial pre-deposit and shows sufficient cause for non-response, an assessment order may be quashed and remitted for de novo consideration, subject to further deposit and filing of reply to safeguard revenue interests.