Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the property valuation for the purpose of section 56(2)(vii)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was required to be with reference to the financial year 2009-10 and whether the matter required remand for verification of the assessee's additional evidence.
Analysis: The assessee had originally booked the flat in 2009 and made payment of the agreed consideration in that year. The later allotment and registration reflected a different flat number, but the area remained the same and the developer's subsequent letter accepted that one flat number in the amended allotment was a typographical error. The additional evidence in the form of the developer's confirmation and the assessee's affidavit was admitted. On these facts, the benefit of the Explanation to section 56(2)(vii)(b) was held to be available, and the valuation issue required verification by the Assessing Officer on the basis of the earlier booking and allotment documents.
Conclusion: The assessee was held entitled to have the stamp duty valuation considered with reference to financial year 2009-10 relevant to assessment year 2010-11, and the matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer for limited verification and fresh assessment after giving an opportunity of hearing.