Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned GST assessment order deserved interference in writ jurisdiction and whether the matter should be remitted for fresh consideration on payment of a stipulated pre-deposit.
Analysis: The Petitioner had not responded to the show-cause notice or availed the personal hearing. The appeal remedy under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had already become time-barred. To balance the interests of both sides, the Court adopted the course followed in similar matters and directed remand with a condition of deposit of 50% of the disputed tax in cash within the stipulated time. The Petitioner was also directed to file a reply with documents, and the earlier recovery was ordered to be adjusted subject to verification. On compliance, the adjudicating authority was required to pass a fresh order on merits and the bank attachment was to stand lifted.
Conclusion: The writ petition was allowed in part by remitting the matter for fresh adjudication subject to pre-deposit, with consequential relief against bank attachment on compliance.