Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned assessment order and the rejection of rectification warranted interference and remand for fresh consideration, subject to payment of part of the disputed tax and filing of a reply to the show cause notice.
Analysis: The petitioner had not responded to the show cause notice preceding the assessment order, and the attempt to invoke rectification under Section 161 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 had failed. The Court followed its consistent view in similar matters that, where the assessee had not earlier responded, the proper course was to remit the matter for a fresh order while balancing the interests of the assessee and the Revenue. The Court also required deposit of 25% of the disputed tax in cash and filing of a reply with supporting documents before fresh adjudication.
Conclusion: The matter was remitted to the respondent for fresh consideration, subject to the stipulated deposit and filing of reply, with the petitioner to be heard before any fresh order is passed.