Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the impugned orders rejecting the petitioner's refund claim relating to ocean freight were liable to be interfered with in view of the binding decision on the same issue.
Analysis: The dispute concerned refund claims for ocean freight for specified periods. The issue had already been answered in favour of the petitioner in earlier proceedings and the same legal position was stated to be covered by the decision in Mohit Minerals, as affirmed by the Supreme Court. In that view, the challenge to the impugned orders did not survive.
Conclusion: The writ petitions were allowed and the petitioner succeeded on the refund issue.