Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions after condoning filing delay, refuses to interfere with High Court orders The SC condoned the delay in filing but dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, declining to interfere with the HC's impugned judgments and orders. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petitions after condoning filing delay, refuses to interfere with High Court orders
The SC condoned the delay in filing but dismissed the Special Leave Petitions, declining to interfere with the HC's impugned judgments and orders. The bench comprising two justices heard counsel for petitioners before reaching this decision. All pending applications were disposed of following the dismissal of the petitions.
Citation: 2025 (7) TMI 93 - SC (Order) Summary: This Supreme Court order, after hearing counsel, "Delay condoned." The Court stated it is "not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgments and orders passed by the High Court." Consequent to that determination, "The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed." The order further records that "Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of." Key legal outcomes: condonation of delay, refusal to grant leave to appeal under Special Leave Petitions, affirmation (by non-interference) of the High Court's impugned judgments and orders, and disposal of any interlocutory or ancillary applications. The decision is an order disposing of the petitions without detailed reasons on merits.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
