Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Due to Massive 327-Day Filing Delay, Emphasizing Strict Adherence to Statutory Time Limits SC dismissed the appeal due to significant delay in filing, finding it time-barred by 327 days. Despite the appellant's request for condonation of delay, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Supreme Court Rejects Appeal Due to Massive 327-Day Filing Delay, Emphasizing Strict Adherence to Statutory Time Limits
SC dismissed the appeal due to significant delay in filing, finding it time-barred by 327 days. Despite the appellant's request for condonation of delay, the court ruled that the appeal was "hopelessly barred by time" and could not be accepted under the applicable statutory provision, resulting in outright dismissal.
The Supreme Court, through Hon'ble Justices Sanjay Kumar and K. V. Viswanathan, dismissed the appeal on the ground of limitation. The appellant sought condonation of a delay of 327 days in filing the appeal. However, the Court held that the appeal was "hopelessly barred by time" and that it "cannot, in any event, condone this delay as per the applicable statutory provision." Consequently, the appeal was dismissed due to the statutory limitation period.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
