Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the writ petition should be entertained against the tax demand, or the petitioner should be relegated to the statutory appellate remedy; and whether any delay in filing such appeal should be ignored.
Analysis: The challenge to the demand depended on the contractual documents said to establish exemption, but those agreements were not produced along with the objections before the assessing authority. In that situation, the authority could not examine the claimed exemption on merits. The proper course was therefore to pursue the statutory appeal under the GST law. To preserve that remedy, the Court directed that an appeal filed within one month would be entertained without taking delay into account. The Court also clarified that it was not expressing any view on the merits of the exemption claim or the tax liability.
Conclusion: The petitioner was relegated to the appellate remedy, and any appeal filed within the stipulated period was to be accepted without reckoning delay.