TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Enhanced compensation taxed in year received under Income-tax Act amendment</h1> The Court held that enhanced compensation is deemed income of the year it is received, as per an amendment to Section 45(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. ... Enhanced compensation - The tribunal took a view that income by way of enhanced compensation could not have accrued to the assessee and the CIT (A) was justified in reducing the amount while computing the total income. – Held that: - the order passed by the Tribunal is not sustainable in light of the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court in Ghanshyam's case. Accordingly, the orders of the Tribunal as well as that of the CIT(A) have to be set aside - after amendment of Section 45 (5) of the Act w.e.f.1.4.1998, the amount of enhanced compensation is deemed to be income of the previous year, in which it is received. Issues:Taxability of enhanced compensation and interest thereon under the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, was directed against an order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal regarding the taxability of enhanced compensation and interest for the assessment year 2000-01. The Tribunal, in line with the CIT(A) order, ruled that income by way of enhanced compensation could not have accrued to the assessee, justifying a reduction in the amount while computing the total income. The Revenue relied on a judgment in CIT v. Ghanshyam (HUF) (2009) to argue that enhanced compensation is deemed income of the year it is received post an amendment to Section 45(5) of the Act from 1.4.1998.The Court noted that the Tribunal's order was unsustainable in light of the Supreme Court judgment in Ghanshyam's case. Consequently, both the Tribunal's and CIT(A)'s orders were set aside. The matter was remitted back to the Tribunal for deciding any unresolved issues, with the directive for the parties to appear before the CIT(A) for further proceedings on 27.5.2010. The CIT(A) was instructed to address all remaining issues as per the law.This judgment highlights the importance of legal precedents and the application of relevant statutory provisions in determining the taxability of enhanced compensation under the Income-tax Act. It underscores the need for consistency in decision-making and adherence to established legal principles to ensure fair and just outcomes in tax matters.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
