Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2025 (5) TMI 548 - HC - GST

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        High Court Quashes Multi-Year CGST Order, Enables Amnesty Scheme Benefits for Specific Financial Years The HC set aside an Order-in-Original covering multiple financial years (2017-18 to 2020-21) under the CGST Act. The court directed separate orders for ...
                          Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                              High Court Quashes Multi-Year CGST Order, Enables Amnesty Scheme Benefits for Specific Financial Years

                              The HC set aside an Order-in-Original covering multiple financial years (2017-18 to 2020-21) under the CGST Act. The court directed separate orders for each financial period, allowing the petitioner to avail the Amnesty Scheme benefits for 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20. The matter was remitted for fresh consideration, with liberty reserved for the petitioner regarding the 2020-21 period.




                              1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDERED

                              The core legal questions considered by the Court are:

                              (a) Whether the impugned Order-in-Original dated 22.11.2023 passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, which encompasses multiple financial periods including 2017-18 to 2020-21, is valid and sustainable in law.

                              (b) Whether the petitioner is entitled to the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme introduced under Section 128(A) of the CGST Act, applicable to the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20, notwithstanding the impugned order covering those periods.

                              (c) Whether the impugned notification No. 9/2023 dated 31.03.2023 is ultravires the Constitution of India and the provisions of the CGST Act, 2017.

                              (d) Whether the impugned order should be quashed and set aside and the matter remitted back for fresh consideration, including passing separate orders for each financial period and allowing the petitioner to avail the Amnesty Scheme benefits.

                              2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSIS

                              Issue (a): Validity of the impugned Order-in-Original covering multiple financial periods

                              The impugned order was passed under Section 73 of the CGST Act, 2017, which deals with determination of tax not paid or short paid or erroneously refunded or input tax credit wrongly availed or utilized. The order covered the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21.

                              The Court examined whether passing a consolidated order covering multiple financial years is permissible or whether separate orders should be passed for each period. The petitioner contended that the impugned order is flawed as it lumps together multiple years without considering the applicability of the Amnesty Scheme for certain years.

                              The Court noted the legal framework under Section 73 and the procedural requirements for issuance of orders. While Section 73 does not explicitly prohibit consolidated orders, the Court emphasized the need for clarity and fairness, especially when different legal provisions (such as an Amnesty Scheme) apply to different periods.

                              Accordingly, the Court reasoned that passing separate or individual orders for each financial year would ensure proper consideration of the legal provisions applicable to each period and safeguard the petitioner's rights.

                              Issue (b): Entitlement to Amnesty Scheme benefits for certain financial years

                              The Amnesty Scheme under Section 128(A) of the CGST Act was introduced with effect from 01.11.2024, allowing taxpayers relief for certain periods, specifically the years 2017-18, 2018-19, and 2019-20.

                              The petitioner sought to avail the benefit of this scheme for these years, arguing that the impugned order, which includes these periods, did not consider the Amnesty Scheme and is therefore liable to be set aside or modified.

                              The Court acknowledged that the Amnesty Scheme explicitly covers these years and that the petitioner is entitled to avail its benefits. The Court found merit in the petitioner's submission that the impugned order should be reconsidered to factor in the Amnesty Scheme relief.

                              The Court thus directed that separate orders be passed for each financial year and that the petitioner be permitted to apply for and avail the Amnesty Scheme benefits for the applicable years.

                              Issue (c): Validity of impugned notification No. 9/2023 dated 31.03.2023

                              The petitioner challenged the notification as ultravires the Constitution and the CGST Act. However, the Court did not delve into detailed analysis or express any opinion on this contention in the present order, focusing primarily on the issues relating to the impugned order and the Amnesty Scheme.

                              Issue (d): Quashing the impugned order and remitting the matter for fresh consideration

                              Considering the above, the Court found it just and appropriate to set aside the impugned Order-in-Original dated 22.11.2023 and remit the matter to the 3rd respondent for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

                              The Court directed that the 3rd respondent shall pass separate orders for each financial year, specifically 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, and 2020-21, taking into account the petitioner's entitlement to the Amnesty Scheme for the first three years.

                              Liberty was reserved to the petitioner to pursue remedies in relation to the period 2020-21, with no opinion expressed on the merits of the contentions relating to that period.

                              The Court's approach balances procedural fairness, statutory interpretation, and the petitioner's rights under the Amnesty Scheme, ensuring compliance with the legal framework.

                              3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS

                              The Court held:

                              "The impugned Order-in-Original dated 22.11.2023 at Annexure-B passed by the 3rd respondent is hereby set aside."

                              "The matter is remitted back to the 3rd respondent for reconsideration afresh, in accordance with law."

                              "The 3rd respondent shall pass separate / individual orders for each of the aforesaid periods i.e., 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20, 2020-21, in accordance with law."

                              "The petitioner is permitted to avail the benefit of Amnesty Scheme for the financial years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20."

                              "In so far as the periods 2020-21 are concerned, liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to take recourse to such remedies as available in law, including approaching this Court, subsequently and no opinion is expressed on the merits / demerits of the rival contentions."

                              Core principles established include the necessity for separate adjudication of tax demands for distinct financial years when different legal provisions or schemes apply, and the recognition of the petitioner's right to avail statutory relief schemes such as the Amnesty Scheme under the CGST Act.


                              Full Summary is available for active users!
                              Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                              Topics

                              ActsIncome Tax
                              No Records Found