TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Civil Appeals, Upholds Procedural Consistency in Delay Condoning and Application Resolution</h1> <h3>The Principal Commissioner Of Custom Versus Flextronics Technologies India Pvt. Ltd.</h3> SC dismissed civil appeals after condoning delay, consistent with previous orders in similar cases. The court referenced its prior dismissals in related ... Classification of 'Receivers' - to be classified under CTH 85177090 or CTH 85181000? - Classification and eligibility of 'Microphones' for exemption under various notifications - Classification of 'Battery Cover, Back Cover, Camera Lens, and Front Cover' and their eligibility for concessional duty - HELD THAT:- It is stated at the bar that identical matters have been dismissed by this Court in the case of Padget Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. [2024 (7) TMI 1220 - SC ORDER] - Following the orders passed by this Court, these Civil Appeals also dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, through an order by Hon'ble Justices B.V. Nagarathna and Nongmeikapam Kotiswar Singh, condoned delay and dismissed the Civil Appeals, aligning with prior dismissals in Padget Electronics Pvt. Ltd. and M/s Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. Specifically, the Court referenced its earlier orders in C.A. Dy. No.24349/2024 (10.07.2024) and C.A. Dy. No.25225/2024 (19.07.2024), stating: 'we dismiss these Civil Appeals also.' All pending applications were disposed of accordingly.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
