TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Rejects Special Leave Petition, Upholds Lower Court Judgment and Dismisses All Pending Applications</h1> <h3>M/s. Goldy Engineering Works Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise & Anr.</h3> SC dismissed SLP after hearing petitioner's counsel, finding no merit in challenging the HC judgment. Court condoned delay and rejected the petition, ... Interest on an asserted delay in disbursal of refund - it was held by CESTAT that 'Section 35FF thus indicates that interest would commence from the date of the order of the Appellate Authority as distinct from the making of an application which is prescribed to be the starting point insofar as Section 11BB of the 1944 Act is concerned.' - HELD THAT:- There are no reason to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court. Hence, the Special Leave Petition is dismissed. The Supreme Court of India, in an order delivered by Justices Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha and Joymalya Bagchi, condoned delay and heard the petitioner's counsel. The Court stated it was 'not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment passed by the High Court,' and accordingly dismissed the Special Leave Petition. All pending applications were disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
