Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the disputed steel cabinets, tables, benches, racks and tool holders, used as shop floor equipment within the factory, were entitled to exemption as capital goods under Notification No. 67/95-C.E. and whether the Revenue's demand and denial of credit could be sustained.
Analysis: The goods were found to be tailor-made items used inside the factory for storing equipment and facilitating shop floor operations. They were not treated as furniture of the kind used for dwelling houses, offices or public buildings, but as equipment used in the manufacturing premises in or in relation to the production of final products. Since Chapter 94 was not excluded from the notification and the items answered the description of capital goods used within the factory, the exemption was held to apply.
Conclusion: The goods were held to be eligible shop floor equipment/capital goods, and the Revenue's challenge failed.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order was upheld and the Revenue's appeal was rejected, with the cross objection disposed of accordingly.
Ratio Decidendi: Goods used within the factory as shop floor equipment for facilitating manufacture can qualify as capital goods for exemption where the relevant tariff chapter is not excluded and the notification covers manufacture for use within the factory.