TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the criminal proceeding alleging cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy against the petitioner company was liable to be quashed on the ground that the allegations did not disclose the necessary ingredients of the offences and the continuation of the proceeding would amount to abuse of process.
Analysis: The complaint arose out of a commercial relationship in which payments were admittedly made by cheque, TDS issues were intertwined with the transaction, and an arbitral award had already been rendered in favour of the petitioner. The materials showed that the dispute was essentially commercial in character and that the complaint was lodged long after the arbitral award, without disclosure of the arbitration proceedings or award. The Court also noted that the prosecution proceeded only against the company, although the company acts through its officers, and relied on the principle that criminal liability of a company case depends on legally sustainable allegations and, where vicarious liability is invoked, the necessary statutory and factual foundation must exist. On the facts, the complaint did not prima facie disclose the ingredients of the alleged offences.
Conclusion: The criminal proceeding was held unsustainable and was quashed as against the petitioner company.
Ratio Decidendi: A criminal proceeding arising from a commercial dispute may be quashed where the complaint does not prima facie disclose the ingredients of the alleged offences and continuation of the prosecution would amount to abuse of process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
