Supreme Court: No Penalty for Late TDS Remittance

The Supreme Court ruled that no penalty is justified under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act for the late remittance of TDS. The Court held that the term "fails to deduct" in Section 271C(1)(a) does not encompass delayed remittance of TDS, emphasizing a strict interpretation of penal provisions. The Court distinguished between non-deduction and late payment of TDS, concluding that Section 271C applies only to non-deduction. The appeals were allowed, and the High Court's judgments were overturned, favoring the assessee and rejecting the imposition of penalties for delayed TDS remittance.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Whether the levy of penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is justified for the late remittance of TDS.
2. Interpretation of the terms "fails to deduct" in Section 271C(1)(a) and its applicability to delayed remittance of TDS.
3. Consideration of reasonable cause under Section 273B for non-imposition of penalty.

Summary:

Issue 1: Levy of Penalty under Section 271C for Late Remittance of TDS
The Supreme Court addressed the appeals against the High Court of Kerala's decision confirming the levy of penalty under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the late remittance of TDS. The appellants, engaged in various businesses, had deducted TDS but remitted it belatedly. The High Court had upheld the penalty, but the Supreme Court examined whether such penalty was justified under Section 271C.

Issue 2: Interpretation of "Fails to Deduct" in Section 271C(1)(a)
The Court analyzed the statutory provisions, particularly Section 271C(1)(a), which states that a penalty is applicable if a person "fails to deduct" the whole or any part of the tax. The Court emphasized that the words "fails to deduct" do not encompass the late remittance of TDS. It held that penal provisions must be construed strictly and literally, and nothing should be added or taken out of the provision. Therefore, Section 271C does not apply to cases of belated remittance of TDS.

Issue 3: Consideration of Reasonable Cause under Section 273B
The Court noted that Section 201(1A) of the Act provides for compensatory interest for belated remittance of TDS, while Section 276B deals with prosecution for failure to pay TDS. The Court highlighted that the Parliament has clearly distinguished between non-deduction and late payment of TDS, with different consequences for each. The Court also referred to the CBDT Circular No. 551, which supports the interpretation that Section 271C applies only to non-deduction of TDS, not to delayed remittance.

Conclusion:
The Supreme Court concluded that for mere delay in remittance of TDS, no penalty is leviable under Section 271C of the Income Tax Act. The appeals were allowed, and the impugned judgments of the High Court were quashed. The Court held that the interpretation of Section 271C should favor the assessee, and no penalty should be imposed for late remittance of TDS.

---