Criminal proceedings under Section 276CC quashed; no specific allegations against Directors for tax return delays.

The court quashed the criminal proceedings under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the company and its Directors. The proceedings were initiated due to the alleged failure to file tax returns timely, but subsequent appellate and tribunal orders nullified the tax liabilities, granting full relief to the petitioners. The court found no specific allegations against the Directors regarding their involvement in the company's daily operations. Citing a precedent from the SC, the court determined that prosecution was unsustainable once penalties were canceled. The petition was allowed, and the case was disposed of.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Quashing of criminal proceedings under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
2. Liability of Directors under section 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
3. Impact of appellate and tribunal orders on criminal prosecution.

Summary:

Issue 1: Quashing of criminal proceedings under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961
The petitioners sought to quash the criminal proceedings arising out of Complaint Case No. 08 of 2012, including the order taking cognizance dated 07.09.2012 under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The case was initiated due to the alleged willful failure of M/s Santpuria Alloys Pvt. Ltd. to file returns for the Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2009-10 and 2010-11 within the statutory period. Despite the company eventually filing the returns on 22.08.2011, 02.09.2011, and 20.09.2011, the prosecution was sanctioned on 08.12.2011.

Issue 2: Liability of Directors under section 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961
The petitioners, who were Directors of the company, argued that they were not initially named as accused in the complaint and were later added without specific allegations of their involvement in the day-to-day affairs of the company. The court emphasized that under section 278B, the complaint must disclose how the Directors were responsible for the company's daily operations, which was lacking in this case.

Issue 3: Impact of appellate and tribunal orders on criminal prosecution
The court noted that the assessment orders for the relevant years were either nullified or partially allowed by appellate authorities, and the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) granted full relief to the petitioners. Consequently, no additional tax liability was imposed on the company. The court referred to the Supreme Court's judgment in K.C. Builders and Another v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, which held that once penalties are canceled, prosecution under section 276CC becomes unsustainable.

Conclusion:
In light of the subsequent orders by the competent authorities nullifying the tax liabilities and the lack of specific allegations against the Directors, the court quashed the entire criminal proceeding, including the order taking cognizance dated 07.09.2012, under section 276CC of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The petition was allowed, and the case was disposed of.

---