Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) whether Section 271C(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 covers failure to remit tax already deducted at source in cases falling under Section 194C; and (ii) whether the benefit of Section 273B is available where the default is non-payment of deducted tax.
Issue (i): Whether Section 271C(1)(b) covers failure to remit tax already deducted at source in cases falling under Section 194C.
Analysis: Section 271C(1)(a) separately deals with failure to deduct tax under Chapter XVII-B, while Section 271C(1)(b) is confined to failure to pay tax only in the specific situations mentioned in sub-section (2) of Section 115-O and the second proviso to Section 194B. The provision is clear and unambiguous, and in a fiscal statute it cannot be enlarged by reading the default covered by clause (a) into clause (b). Non-remittance of tax deducted under Section 194C is therefore outside the scope of Section 271C(1)(b).
Conclusion: Section 271C(1)(b) does not apply to non-payment of tax deducted at source under Section 194C, and penalty was not leviable on that basis.
Issue (ii): Whether the benefit of Section 273B is available where the default is non-payment of deducted tax.
Analysis: Section 273B applies to Section 271C in its entirety and contains no restriction confining reasonable-cause relief only to clause (a) of Section 271C(1). Where the statute permits penalty to be imposed, the assessee may still avoid it by proving reasonable cause. The earlier view that Section 273B was unavailable for cases of non-remittance of deducted tax was incorrect.
Conclusion: The benefit of Section 273B is available even in cases falling under Section 271C(1)(b), subject to proof of reasonable cause.
Final Conclusion: The contrary departmental and appellate orders were set aside, the reference was answered in favour of the assessee, and the appeals were allowed.
Ratio Decidendi: In a fiscal statute, a penalty provision must be construed strictly, and a court cannot enlarge a clearly limited penal clause by reading into it defaults covered by a different clause; Section 273B remains available where the statute itself includes Section 271C.