SC Dismisses Special Leave Petition Due to 209-Day Delay; No Satisfactory Explanation from Petitioner Found. The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a 'gross delay of 209 days' in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. The ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
SC Dismisses Special Leave Petition Due to 209-Day Delay; No Satisfactory Explanation from Petitioner Found.
The SC dismissed the Special Leave Petition due to a "gross delay of 209 days" in filing, which was not satisfactorily explained by the petitioner. The Court found no reason to interfere with the HC's impugned order and dismissed the petition on the grounds of both delay and merits. All pending applications were also disposed of.
The Supreme Court, presided over by HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.B. PARDIWALA and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. MAHADEVAN, addressed a Special Leave Petition filed by the petitioner, represented by Mr. Raghavendra P Shankar, A.S.G., and others. The Court noted a "gross delay of 209 days" in filing the petition, which was "not satisfactorily explained" by the petitioner. The Court found "no reason to interfere with the impugned order" of the High Court. Consequently, the Special Leave Petition was "dismissed on the ground of delay as well as merits." All pending applications were also disposed of.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
TaxTMI 
