Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty for non-compliance with notices under section 142(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was leviable under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 when the assessee showed reasonable cause for the default.
Analysis: The assessee had participated in the original assessment, the reassessment proceedings arose after revision under section 264 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and the notices under section 142(1) were issued during the Covid period. The Tribunal accepted that the assessee was posted in a far-off place with inadequate telephone and internet connectivity and that these circumstances constituted reasonable cause. It also relied on section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which bars penalty where reasonable cause is proved. On that basis, the Tribunal found the levy of penalty unsustainable.
Conclusion: Penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was not justified and was directed to be cancelled.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the assessee proves reasonable cause for non-compliance, section 273B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 protects against penalty under section 271(1)(b) of the Income-tax Act, 1961.