Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the electronic credit ledger could be blocked under Rule 86A without notice and hearing to the affected person.
Analysis: Rule 86A of the Rajasthan Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 empowers the Commissioner or an authorised officer, not below the rank prescribed by the rule, to disallow debit of electronic credit ledger where there are reasons to believe that input tax credit has been fraudulently availed or is ineligible, and reasons must be recorded in writing. Even though the rule does not expressly provide for a hearing, the authority exercising the statutory power is obliged to hear the affected person before taking a decision. In the present case, the notice was issued by an authority who was not competent to take the final decision, while the impugned blocking order was passed by the competent authority without hearing the petitioner. Such a procedure prima facie violates the principles of natural justice.
Conclusion: The blocking of the petitioner's electronic credit ledger was kept in abeyance and the respondents were restrained from giving effect to the blocking decision.
Ratio Decidendi: When a statutory power to block input tax credit is exercised without expressly excluding fairness, the competent authority must afford notice and hearing to the affected person before acting on the material and recording reasons in writing.