Petitioner Permitted to Withdraw Writ Petition, Preserves Right to Pursue Alternate Appellate Remedy Without Prejudice HC granted petitioner's request to withdraw writ petition, allowing pursuit of appellate remedy. Court made no observations on case merits or appeal's ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Petitioner Permitted to Withdraw Writ Petition, Preserves Right to Pursue Alternate Appellate Remedy Without Prejudice
HC granted petitioner's request to withdraw writ petition, allowing pursuit of appellate remedy. Court made no observations on case merits or appeal's maintainability, leaving limitation period issues to be determined by Appellate Authority according to statutory provisions. Writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
In the case before the Patna High Court, presided over by Honourable the Chief Justice and Honourable Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy, the petitioner, represented by Mr. Shambhu Nath Jha, sought to withdraw the writ petition to pursue an appellate remedy. The court granted this request, with the stipulation that any issues related to the limitation period would need to be addressed by the Appellate Authority "as per the statute and in accordance with law." The court clarified that it made no observations on the merits of the case or the appeal's maintainability if it was filed beyond the limitation period. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.