Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an ex parte adjudication order demanding service tax was liable to be set aside for denial of hearing and the matter restored to the adjudicating authority for fresh consideration.
Analysis: The impugned demand was made ex parte and the petitioner asserted that the show cause notice and order had not been received. Since the petitioner's exemption contention had not been considered by the adjudicating authority, the matter involved denial of hearing and required restoration so that the contention could be placed before the authority and decided afresh.
Conclusion: The ex parte adjudication order was quashed and the matter was remanded to the adjudicating authority for fresh decision after consideration of the petitioner's contention.
Ratio Decidendi: An ex parte adjudication that does not consider a party's contention and thereby denies hearing is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh adjudication.