Court Sets Tax Dispute Timeline: Deposit 25% in 4 Weeks or Face Reinstated Order, Objections Allowed in 8 Weeks Total. The impugned order was set aside, allowing the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, which would convert the order into a show ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Court Sets Tax Dispute Timeline: Deposit 25% in 4 Weeks or Face Reinstated Order, Objections Allowed in 8 Weeks Total.
The impugned order was set aside, allowing the petitioner to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks, which would convert the order into a show cause notice. This conversion enables the petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents within an additional four weeks. Non-compliance with these timelines will result in the restoration of the impugned order. The bank attachment will be lifted upon payment of the required amount within two weeks. The Writ Petition was disposed of without costs, and related motions were closed, providing a structured resolution path for the tax dispute.
Issues: Challenge to impugned order passed by respondent for assessment year 2018-19. Service of show cause notices and order via common portal. Petitioner's request for opportunity to explain discrepancies and willingness to pay 25% of disputed tax. Bank attachment and lifting of the same.
Analysis: The petitioner, engaged in the business of Scrab and a registered dealer under Goods and Services Act, 2017, challenged the impugned order passed by the respondent related to the assessment year 2018-19. The petitioner was found to have fraudulently availed ineligible input tax credit during an inspection conducted under Section 67 of the GST Act. Despite notices issued, the petitioner did not respond or pay the tax amount, leading to the passing of the impugned order.
The challenge to the impugned order was based on the contention that the show cause notices and the assessment order were not served directly to the petitioner but uploaded on the common portal, which the petitioner claimed they were unable to access. The petitioner sought an opportunity to explain the alleged discrepancies and cited a recent judgment in support of their request. They expressed readiness to pay 25% of the disputed tax and requested a final opportunity to present objections before the adjudicating authority.
In response to the petitioner's submissions, the impugned order was set aside, and the petitioner was directed to deposit 25% of the disputed tax within four weeks. This deposit would convert the impugned order into a show cause notice, allowing the petitioner to submit objections with supporting documents within another four weeks. Failure to comply with these timelines would result in the restoration of the impugned order. Additionally, the order specified the lifting of bank attachment upon payment of the required amount within two weeks.
Consequently, the Writ Petition was disposed of with no order as to costs, and related motions were closed. The judgment provided a clear framework for the petitioner to address the tax dispute, emphasizing compliance with the specified timelines and conditions for further proceedings and the resolution of the matter.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.