TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Greater Noida Authority can't be a financial creditor, can object to plans as operational creditor.</h1> <h3>GREATER NOIDA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Versus ANAND SONBHADRA</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by the Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority, determining that it cannot be classified as a financial ... Entitlement to raise an objection to the Resolution Plan - Whether the appellant, GNOIDA, is to be treated as a financial creditor? - HELD THAT:- The appellant, GNOIDA, will be entitled to raise all claims in this regard in accordance with law and in terms of the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Recording the aforesaid, the appeal is dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal by Greater Noida Industrial Development Authority (GNOIDA), holding that GNOIDA cannot be treated as a financial creditor. The Court allowed GNOIDA to raise objections to the Resolution Plan as an operational creditor or secured operational creditor under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
