Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to an opportunity of hearing on the pending application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration, and whether the competent authority was required to decide that application.
Analysis: Section 30 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was read to require that an application for revocation of cancellation of registration not be rejected without affording the applicant an opportunity of being heard. Since no order had been passed on the revocation application, the matter required consideration by the competent authority after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner was also permitted to file a fresh detailed application if advised.
Conclusion: The petitioner was entitled to a hearing and to a decision on the pending revocation application; the competent authority was directed to pass the requisite order within three weeks.
Final Conclusion: The writ petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondents to hear the petitioner and decide the revocation application expeditiously.
Ratio Decidendi: An application for revocation of cancellation of GST registration cannot be rejected without affording the applicant an opportunity of hearing, and a pending revocation request must be decided by the competent authority.