Legal Challenge Succeeds: Section 108 Proceedings Quashed Due to Lack of Natural Justice Principles The HC allowed the petition challenging proceedings under Section 108 of KGST/CGST Act, finding a violation of natural justice. The court quashed the ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Legal Challenge Succeeds: Section 108 Proceedings Quashed Due to Lack of Natural Justice Principles
The HC allowed the petition challenging proceedings under Section 108 of KGST/CGST Act, finding a violation of natural justice. The court quashed the impugned order dated 21.05.2024, directing respondent to provide notice and opportunity to the petitioner before taking further action, while keeping all other contentions open.
Issues: Challenge to impugned proceedings under Section 108 of KGST/CGST Act, 2017. Violation of principles of natural justice.
Analysis: The petitioner sought relief to set aside the impugned proceedings dated 21.05.2024 under Section 108 (1) of the KGST/CGST Act, 2017 and any other relief deemed fit by the court. The petitioner had filed a detailed reply and submissions in response to an Order of Detention dated 16.11.2023, which were rejected. The goods were later released, but the petitioner was aggrieved by the imposition of a penalty by the Appellate Authority. The petitioner contended that the subsequent order by respondent No. 3 under Section 108 of KGST Act was illegal and violated principles of natural justice. The respondent argued that the revisional jurisdiction under Section 108 was valid. The court observed that the petitioner was not notified or given an opportunity before the impugned order was passed, leading to a violation of natural justice.
The court allowed the petition, quashed the impugned order dated 21.05.2024 passed by respondent No. 3, and reserved liberty for respondent No. 3 to take necessary steps in accordance with the law after notifying and providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. The court kept all contentions between the parties, including jurisdiction and maintainability, open without expressing any opinion on the same.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.