Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the demand order confirming drawback recovery against the petitioner, without proper consideration of the petitioner's reply and hearing, warranted interference and remand for fresh adjudication.
Analysis: The petitioner asserted that bank realization certificates and negative statements had already been furnished in response to earlier notices, while the impugned order did not clearly deal with that reply. The respondent also acknowledged that the petitioner was not heard before the order was passed. In these circumstances, the order suffered from a procedural infirmity and required reconsideration after giving the petitioner an opportunity to place the relevant export documents and shipping bill-wise particulars.
Conclusion: The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remitted to the respondent for a fresh decision on merits after affording an opportunity of hearing. The petitioner was directed to cooperate and furnish the requisite documents, failing which the respondent was at liberty to proceed on the available materials.
Ratio Decidendi: An adjudication confirming demand without affording a meaningful opportunity of hearing and without dealing with the relevant reply is liable to be set aside and remitted for fresh consideration.