TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petition, Condones Delay and Closes Case Without Substantive Review Under Article 136</h1> <h3>AMIT PANDEY Versus THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS.</h3> The SC dismissed the SLP under Art. 136, condoning the delay. All pending applications were disposed of, effectively concluding the legal proceedings ... Constitutional Validity of Sections 2, 9, 12 and 18 of the Constitution (101st Amendment) Act, 2016 violating the basic structure of the Constitution of India - grounds raised are based on the constitution of a Goods and Services Tax Council (GST Council), on whose recommendations the Parliament is alleged to be acting, which, according to the writ petitioner, is an abdication of the legislative functions - it was held by High Court that 'A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, as held by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, is maintainable either for the purpose of enforcing a statutory or legal right or with respect to breach of statutory duty on the part of the authorities. The petitioner has no enforceable right judicially recognized, insofar as the 101st Amendment to the Constitution is concerned and he does not claim any prejudice having been caused to him'. HELD THAT:- It is not required to entertain the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution. SLP dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution after condoning the delay. Any pending application was disposed of.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
