Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2024 (7) TMI 1418 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Trading losses in penny shares allowed as AO failed to prove transactions were bogus or manipulative ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance of trading losses in penny shares. The AO had treated the transactions as bogus, arguing ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Trading losses in penny shares allowed as AO failed to prove transactions were bogus or manipulative

                            ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee's appeal against disallowance of trading losses in penny shares. The AO had treated the transactions as bogus, arguing they lacked commercial prudence being conducted at year-end. However, ITAT found the AO failed to prove the transactions were bogus and noted selective interpretation - accepting gains as genuine while rejecting losses. The tribunal observed that millions of shares were traded in the market with assessee trading only thousands, negating market manipulation allegations. Following precedent in Namokar Builders case, ITAT deleted the addition and granted consequential relief.




                            Issues Involved:
                            1. Disallowance of trading loss on shares.
                            2. Allegation of sham transactions.
                            3. Lack of independent inquiry by the Assessing Officer (AO).
                            4. Reliance on statements not provided to the assessee.
                            5. Denial of cross-examination of adverse statements.
                            6. Reliance on third-party reports without independent verification.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Disallowance of Trading Loss on Shares:
                            The assessee filed a return of income for AY 2014-15 declaring a total loss of Rs. 16,38,240/-. The AO disallowed the entire trading loss of Rs. 1,13,70,981/-, assessing the total income at Rs. 97,32,741/-. The AO doubted the genuineness of the transactions, suspecting them to be artificially designed to offset gains from Eros International Media Ltd. The AO highlighted the poor financials of the companies where losses were incurred and alleged pre-meditation in trading patterns.

                            2. Allegation of Sham Transactions:
                            The AO considered the transactions in shares of GBL Infra Ltd., Shree Shaleen Textile Ltd., and Unno Industries Ltd. as sham, based on the poor financial condition of these companies and the suspicious timing of transactions. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, agreeing that the transactions were outside the realm of prudent investment behavior.

                            3. Lack of Independent Inquiry by the AO:
                            The assessee argued that no independent inquiry was conducted by the AO to prove his suspicion. The AO relied on an adverse report from the Investigation Wing without making it available to the assessee. The assessee contended that dealing in penny stocks is common and based on market understanding, and the transactions were conducted through recognized brokers and banking channels.

                            4. Reliance on Statements Not Provided to the Assessee:
                            The assessee claimed that the AO relied on statements and materials not provided to them, making such reliance inadmissible. The assessee emphasized that their accounts were duly audited, and no fault was found by the AO.

                            5. Denial of Cross-Examination of Adverse Statements:
                            The assessee argued that they were not provided an opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses whose statements were used against them. The lack of cross-examination violated the principles of natural justice, making the statements inadmissible for assessment purposes.

                            6. Reliance on Third-Party Reports Without Independent Verification:
                            The AO based his findings on a third-party report from the Investigation Wing, without conducting any independent verification. The assessee contended that mere suspicion could not substitute for hard facts, and the transactions were genuine, conducted through recognized stock exchanges and de-mat accounts.

                            Conclusion:
                            The Tribunal considered the rival submissions and relevant judicial decisions. It was noted that the AO selectively viewed the transactions, accepting gains but doubting losses without substantial evidence. The Tribunal emphasized the need for independent inquiry and adherence to principles of natural justice. The Tribunal followed the precedent set in similar cases, concluding that the disallowance of trading loss was not justified. The appeal filed by the assessee was allowed, and the impugned addition was deleted, providing consequential relief to the assessee.

                            Order:
                            The appeal filed by the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 23rd July, 2024.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found