Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Supreme Court dismisses Special Leave Petition under Article 136, no interference warranted. Question of law remains open.</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1 KANPUR Versus RENU AGGARWAL</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating no interference is warranted. The question ... Addition u/s 68 - penny stock purchases - As decided by HC name of the appellants were neither quoted by any of persons nor any material relating to the assessee was found at any place where investigation was done by the investigation Wing - HELD THAT:- No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition under Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating no interference is warranted. The question of law remains open, and any pending applications are disposed of.