Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the petitioner was entitled to writ relief against SARFAESI recovery measures, or should be relegated to the Debts Recovery Tribunal where proceedings were already pending.
Analysis: The writ petition arose from steps initiated under the SARFAESI framework, while the petitioner's challenge and request for regularisation were already being pursued before the Debts Recovery Tribunal in a pending interlocutory application. In these circumstances, the appropriate course was for the petitioner to prosecute the pending remedy before the Tribunal rather than continue in writ proceedings. The interim protection granted earlier was directed to continue only for a limited period till the date fixed before the Tribunal.
Conclusion: The petitioner was relegated to the remedy before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and the writ petition was disposed of with limited continuation of interim protection till 01.02.2024.