Tax Assessment Overturned: Procedural Fairness Prevails, Taxpayer Granted Opportunity to Respond and Challenge Demand HC set aside tax assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand. Court directed 10% tax payment, ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Tax Assessment Overturned: Procedural Fairness Prevails, Taxpayer Granted Opportunity to Respond and Challenge Demand
HC set aside tax assessment order due to lack of reasonable opportunity for the petitioner to contest the tax demand. Court directed 10% tax payment, allowed response to show cause notice, and mandated fresh order with personal hearing within three months. Bank attachment was lifted, and the writ petition was disposed of without costs.
Issues: 1. Lack of reasonable opportunity to contest tax demand. 2. Compliance with principles of natural justice. 3. Mismatch in GSTR returns and auto-populated data. 4. Setting aside the impugned order and providing an opportunity to contest the tax demand.
Analysis:
1. The petitioner challenged an order dated 30.12.2023, claiming they were not given a fair chance to contest the tax demand. They argued that they were unaware of the proceedings leading to the assessment order as all communications were done through the GST portal without direct communication. The petitioner only became aware of the situation upon receiving a bank attachment notice on 15.04.2024. They contended that the impugned order lacked reasons and no personal hearing was granted.
2. The petitioner's counsel highlighted the lack of reasons in the impugned order and the absence of a personal hearing. On the other hand, the Government Advocate for the 1st respondent argued that the principles of natural justice were upheld by issuing a show cause notice on 29.09.2023 and offering a personal hearing to the petitioner.
3. Upon reviewing the show cause notice, it was evident that the tax proposal was based on discrepancies between the petitioner's GSTR returns and auto-populated data. The assessment was confirmed without giving the petitioner an opportunity to be heard. The petitioner's claim of being unaware of the proceedings was considered, leading to a decision that justice required providing the petitioner with a chance to contest the tax demand.
4. Consequently, the impugned order dated 30.12.2023 was set aside with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand within two weeks. The petitioner was allowed to respond to the show cause notice within this period. Once the response was received and the 10% payment confirmed, the 1st respondent was directed to grant a reasonable opportunity, including a personal hearing, and issue a fresh order within three months. The bank attachment was lifted due to the setting aside of the assessment order. The writ petition was disposed of without costs, and related petitions were closed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
